The foundational frameworks of the entire course: CIA Triad, risk assessment, defense in depth, physical security controls, insider threats, the eight-phase attack kill chain, and the four security control types. Unit 2 generates the most exam questions of any single unit.
Every security decision in every unit maps back to one or more of the three CIA pillars. The exam presents scenarios and asks which pillar is violated, or which control protects which pillar.
| Pillar | Meaning | Example violation | Example control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Confidentiality | Only authorized parties can access the information. | Employee emails a customer list to a personal account. | Encryption, access controls, DLP. |
| Integrity | Information is accurate and cannot be altered by unauthorized parties. | Attacker modifies financial records in transit. | Cryptographic hashing, digital signatures, audit logs. |
| Availability | Information and systems are accessible when needed by authorized users. | DDoS attack takes down a banking website. | Redundancy, load balancing, DDoS mitigation, backup power. |
Exam tip: A single attack can violate multiple pillars. Ransomware primarily violates Availability (files are locked) but may also violate Confidentiality (data is exfiltrated before encryption). When the question asks "which pillar," identify the primary violation described in the scenario.
Risk is quantified as the product of how likely a threat is and how severe its impact would be:
$$\text{Risk} = \text{Likelihood} \times \text{Impact}$$
A standard 5×5 risk matrix assigns values 1–5 to each axis. Controls are recommended in proportion to calculated risk — not every risk justifies the same investment.
No single control is sufficient. Layers of controls across three domains ensure that bypassing one layer does not mean a successful breach.
| Domain | Examples |
|---|---|
| Physical | Locks, fences, mantraps, badge access, security cameras |
| Logical (Technical) | Firewalls, encryption, access controls, IDS/IPS, MFA |
| Administrative | Security policies, procedures, training, background checks, separation of duties |
An attacker who tailgates into a building (bypasses a physical control) is still stopped by a login password (logical), and may be caught on CCTV reviewed after a SIEM alert (detective + administrative).
| Control | How it works | Control type |
|---|---|---|
| Badge / keycard | RFID or magnetic-stripe credential grants zone access. Logs entry/exit timestamps. Revocable instantly. | Preventative + Detective |
| Biometrics | Fingerprint, iris, or facial recognition. Cannot be shared, stolen, or forgotten. High assurance of identity. | Preventative |
| Mantrap / airlock | Two-door chamber: first door must close before second opens. Prevents tailgating and piggybacking. | Preventative |
| CCTV | Visible cameras deter attempts (preventative). Footage supports forensic review (detective). | Preventative + Detective |
Key distinction: Tailgating = following an authorized person through a door without their knowledge. Piggybacking = doing so with their (sometimes unwitting) consent. Both are defeated by mantraps; badge access alone does not stop either.
An insider threat originates from someone with authorized access — employee, contractor, or business partner. Two categories:
Mitigations: Least privilege (limit access to only what is needed), separation of duties (require two people for sensitive actions), UEBA (behavioral analytics to detect anomalies), exit procedures (immediate revocation of access).
Understanding the attack sequence lets defenders identify where they can intervene to stop or limit an attack.
| # | Phase | What happens | Defensive opportunity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reconnaissance | OSINT, network scanning, identifying targets | Reduce public footprint; honeypots |
| 2 | Weaponization | Crafting the exploit or malicious payload | Threat intelligence; vulnerability patching |
| 3 | Delivery | Email attachment, link, USB, or web exploit | Email filtering, user training, web proxy |
| 4 | Exploitation | Vulnerability triggered; code executes | Patch management, secure coding, sandboxing |
| 5 | Installation | Backdoor, rootkit, or scheduled task installed | Endpoint detection, application whitelisting |
| 6 | Command & Control (C2) | Compromised host beacons to attacker infrastructure | DNS sinkholing, outbound firewall rules, SIEM |
| 7 | Exfiltration | Data stolen, files encrypted (ransomware), objective achieved | DLP, network monitoring, data classification |
| 8 | Evasion | Logs deleted, channels encrypted, traffic blends in | Immutable logs, SIEM correlation, forensics |
| Type | When it acts | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Preventative | Before — stops the attack from occurring | Firewalls, access controls, encryption, security training, mantrap |
| Detective | During/after — identifies that an attack occurred | IDS, audit logs, SIEM alerts, CCTV footage review |
| Corrective | After — restores normal operations | Incident response plan, data backups, patch management, system reimaging |
| Compensating | When the ideal control is unavailable — equivalent protection by alternative means | Manual approval workflow when automated MFA is unavailable; network segmentation to isolate an unpatched legacy system |
Exam trap: A CCTV camera is both preventative (visible cameras deter) and detective (footage is reviewed after an incident). Classify by the function described in the specific scenario context.
Physical infrastructure security extends to environmental risks that directly violate Availability:
Original Practice Scenario · Tian2 AP
Scenario: A hospital's risk team identifies two threats: (A) a staff member accidentally emailing a patient record to the wrong address (Likelihood: High; Impact: Medium, scored 4×3=12) and (B) a nation-state attack on the medication dispensing system (Likelihood: Low; Impact: Very High, scored 2×5=10).
(A) Which threat should receive higher priority investment? Explain using the risk matrix.
Threat A (score 12) has higher priority. The risk matrix incorporates both dimensions; the accidental email threat's much higher likelihood outweighs the impact difference at these values. Risk management allocates resources proportionate to total calculated risk, not worst-case scenario alone.
(B) For Threat A, identify the CIA pillar violated and recommend one preventative and one detective control.
Pillar: Confidentiality — patient data is disclosed to an unauthorized party.
Preventative: Data Loss Prevention (DLP) software scans outbound email for patterns matching protected health information (PHI) and blocks or quarantines the message before delivery.
Detective: Email audit logging with automated SIEM alerts when messages containing large volumes of structured data are sent to external addresses outside an approved whitelist.