Tian2 The Library of Competitions Tian2 Editions
Volume I · MMXXVIBerkeley Physics
Library Physics Berkeley Physics Tournament
⁂   Physics · Team Tournament · UC Berkeley · Inaugural 2026

The Berkeley Physics Tournament.

A brand-new (inaugural 2026) team-based physics tournament hosted by UC Berkeley's Society of Physics Students. Three timed rounds — Lab, Team Free-Response, GUTS — with 25 teams in the first year. The full 2026 archive is publicly available and all five PDFs are verified. Student and Instructor editions published.

3 team rounds 5 PDFs in archive 25 teams in 2026 April 19, 2026
An introduction

The newest entry on the physics shelf.

The Berkeley Physics Tournament is UC Berkeley's inaugural-2026 team-based physics contest, run by the Society of Physics Students in the Physics North building on campus. In its first year, 25 teams competed across three timed rounds. Because the tournament is brand new, the field is small and the archive is exactly one year deep — but that one year is fully public, fully archived, and a strong basis for preparation.

A competition day runs three back-to-back team rounds with different characters. The Lab round asks teams to design an experimental procedure and collect real data under time pressure. The Team FRQ round presents nine multi-part written problems pitched beyond standard high-school physics, designed for teams to split. The GUTS round is a fast relay where strategy matters as much as physics knowledge. All three rounds are team-only — there is no individual component.

2026 archive — verified on disk

All five publicly available BPT PDFs are SHA-256 verified: Team FRQ problems (6 pp), GUTS problems (9 pp), Lab + rubric (3 pp), Team FRQ problems-and-solutions (16 pp), GUTS problems-and-solutions (12 pp). The Lab solutions gap is real — the organizers do not publish them. The problems and solutions are read-at-source only; Tian2 does not reproduce official content. Read them free at berkeley-pt.org/archive/ ↗.

The three rounds

Lab, FRQ, GUTS — three different physics muscles.

RoundWorking timeWeightWhat it tests
Team Lab 60 minutes 20% Hands-on measurement with supplied materials. Graded on procedure, data quality, discussion, and error analysis. Lab solutions not published — rubric is public.
Team FRQ 75 minutes 40% Nine multi-part long-form problems spanning topics beyond standard high-school physics. Partial credit for justified intermediate steps. Problems and solutions both published.
GUTS 75 minutes 40% Eight sets of three problems submitted in batches; the final set is estimation-based. Strategy-heavy — skip-and-return is essential. Problems and solutions both published.
Why BPT in 2026

A field of 25 teams in year one.

The inaugural field was 25 teams. For a school team looking to compete in a tournament-style physics contest without competing against decades of HMMT veterans, BPT in its early years is a particularly accessible entry point. As with any new competition, format changes between cycles are possible — verify rules and format against the official site before committing.

Strategy sketch — what the 2026 archive reveals

Lab: Reasoning over perfect data. The rubric rewards uncertainty analysis and a clear written procedure more than a clean numerical answer. FRQ: State assumptions before computing; partial credit is awarded for justified intermediate steps even when the final answer is wrong. GUTS: Triage on first read — identify 1-minute checks, 5-minute setups, and deep wells; submit the short ones immediately and skip the deep wells unless time permits.

A six-week preparation plan

For a team with AP Physics 1/2/C background.

  • Week 1 — Orientation: Read the official BPT syllabus and reference sheet. Time yourselves on the 2026 GUTS set under realistic conditions (75 min, one shared workspace). Debrief: which problems did you triage well, which did you sink time into? Assign informal team roles.
  • Week 2 — Team FRQ: Work through the 2026 FRQ set without solutions. Then compare write-ups against the published solutions PDF, focusing on partial-credit hygiene: did you state assumptions, label variables, produce intermediate steps?
  • Week 3 — Lab: Read the 2026 Lab problem and rubric. Reverse-engineer the rubric — what does a full-credit team produce? Run a mock lab (e.g., simple-pendulum g measurement) and grade each other against the rubric criteria.
  • Week 4 — GUTS speed: Re-run the 2026 GUTS set aiming to finish more problems than Week 1. Drill 10-minute sprint sets of mixed textbook problems (mechanics, E&M, thermo, optics, modern).
  • Week 5 — Full simulation: Three-round day if schedule allows: 60 min Lab → 75 min FRQ → 75 min GUTS with real breaks. Capture what went wrong — handoff confusion, unit errors, lost intermediate results.
  • Week 6 — Taper: Re-read the official syllabus and tips page. Confirm travel, registration, and what to bring. Sleep.
A brand-new tournament. The field is small; the problems are good. — Editor's note
References & resources

Where to go from here.

ResourceWhat it is
berkeley-pt.org ↗Official site — dates, registration, rules, syllabus PDF
BPT 2026 Archive ↗All five public PDFs — problems and solutions for FRQ and GUTS; Lab + rubric
Syllabus & reference sheet ↗Official topic scope, team-size rules, scoring formula, approved formula sheet
2026 Results ↗Final rankings and medal breakdown from the inaugural year
Tian2 Student Edition (PDF) ↓Independent prep guide — round breakdowns, 6-week plan, strategy notes, worked examples
Tian2 Instructor Edition (PDF) ↓School-side guide — team management, registration, coaching notes